In partnership with
Don’t get SaaD. Get Rippling.
Remember when software made business simpler?
Today, the average company runs 100+ apps—each with its own logins, data, and headaches. HR can’t find employee info. IT fights security blind spots. Finance reconciles numbers instead of planning growth.
Our State of Software Sprawl report reveals the true cost of “Software as a Disservice” (SaaD)—and how much time, money, and sanity it’s draining from your teams.
The future of work is unified. Don’t get SaaD. Get Rippling.
The Big Sip
Image: Fortune
Jeff Bezos announced at Italian Tech Week that millions will live in space by choice within two decades, with massive AI-powered data centers operating in orbit.
Three billionaires are making civilization-level decisions about humanity's future in space. They're determining who lives off-world, where industrial infrastructure gets built, and how orbital energy systems operate. No democratic process is involved.
Will Blue Origin's Orbital Reef station launch this decade as planned? Will any government attempt to regulate who decides humanity's space future before the infrastructure is built?
Reciepts
• [Report] Financial Times coverage of Bezos Italian Tech Week appearance, 4 Oct 2025 — Direct quotes on timeline for millions living in space and orbital data center economics
• [Report] Reuters on space-based data center predictions, 4 Oct 2025 — Details on gigawatt-scale facilities and cost comparisons to terrestrial infrastructure
• [Analysis] TechCrunch on Blue Origin's Orbital Reef timeline, 4 Oct 2025 — Commercial station development schedule and NASA partnership details
• [Opinion] Space industry analysis defending private sector leadership — Counter-argument that democratic institutions lack the speed and capital to develop space infrastructure; private companies with profit incentives drive faster innovation than government programs
The counter-case is loud: Physics and finance bite. A 1-gigawatt space data centre means thousands of tonnes of kit and launch bills in the tens of billions. Tom's Hardware
The vision: robots do manual labour, humans float in orbital bliss. Strange coming from a company that monitors warehouse workers' bathroom time.
Here’s The Brew
The people designing space colonization stand to gain from leaving Earth's regulatory environment.
Within hours of Bezos's Friday announcement, the framing was set: orbital habitats will feature 24/7 solar power, no weather interruptions, and no existing regulatory frameworks.
Infrastructure built in orbital jurisdiction faces zero labor laws, environmental regulations, or democratic oversight.
Bezos and his Blue Origin investors gain early control of orbital infrastructure and data centers. Earth's population inherits whatever governance emerges from private capital.
"People will live there because they want to" assumes choice exists. Billionaires are building the infrastructure first.
Public input on humanity's orbital future remains absent. Access requires purchasing tickets.
Two Sides, One Mug
Image: Space.com
Pro: Private capital moves faster than democratic institutions on emerging technologies. Space development will happen regardless. American companies can embed democratic values in orbital infrastructure early.
Con: Decisions about humanity's future in space, industrial distribution, and governance frameworks need public deliberation. Three billionaires with launch companies shouldn't make these choices alone.
Our read: There's a difference between "entrepreneurs leading innovation" and "oligarchs deciding where humanity lives." Bezos isn't proposing a product. He's redesigning civilization without a mandate.
Receipt of the Day
Why it shifts the read: Bezos explicitly frames space colonisation as driven by choice ("people will be living in space mostly because they want to"), which hides the fact that the only options available will be the ones his infrastructure creates. The framing reveals the democratic deficit.
Spit Take
"Millions in space by 2045. Zero public votes." — Bezos timeline, 2025
Coffee Break Links ×3
[Report] CNN coverage of Bezos space predictions — Comprehensive breakdown of the orbital data center economics and comparison to Musk's Mars timeline. Worth reading for the competitive dynamics between billionaire space visions.
[Analysis] Comparison of Bezos orbital habitats vs Musk's Mars colonies — Technical assessment of which approach is more feasible in the stated timeframes. Spoiler: neither asks who should decide.
[Report] Blue Origin's Orbital Reef commercial station development — Official timeline and partnership details with Sierra Space and NASA. The public-private funding split is revealing about who controls the vision.Subscribe
Join your team of caffeinated skeptics.
One take, one counter, one receipt.
Six minutes.
Mugshot Poll 📊
Who should decide humanity's space future?
Save Money, Buy Coffee
As an expat living in Vietnam for over 13 years, I often miss my favorite TV programs from back home.
Whether it’s the latest Match of the Day on iPlayer or a comedy series on the UK’s Netflix, I have to use a VPN to access my British TV hit.
After being a customer for over 3 years, SurfShark is the only VPN I trust. It’s reliable, safe, and works anywhere.
Get 3 months FREE with my link: https://surfshark.club/friend/WMz5QGv9
Before we wrap up today…
Does crypto/Web3 intrigue you?
Is worrying about losing money or getting scammed stopping you from investing?
This course is for you!
Click to share (2 referrals get you free access to your very own crypto mastery email course).
Everything you need to unlock crypto in 5 days (for beginners)./
You can read Friday’s newsletter on AI’s death threat to humans here.
For the love of coffee, see you tomorrow!
Enjoy your Monday, keep it caffeinated.
How did we do?
Send It: If you enjoyed today’s episode of Curse and Coffee, share it with your fellow skeptics. Here’s the link.
Be sure to get your daily curse and coffee fix by hitting that subscribe button.