The Internet's New Sweatshop Has 40,000 Teenagers

Today:
A 16-year-old in his bedroom is now your local newsroom.
Honestly?
Good for him.

The kids are winning.

NPR reported on Tuesday a 25-year-old in Antwerp has built a network of 40,000 clippers. Their average age is 16 to 24. They're chopping podcasts and Premier League goals into bait, uploading the same edit to four platforms, and getting paid per view.

Good for them.

The story isn't the teenagers. It’s who's banking the upside..

Start with the kids, because they earned it.

Emrah Bayraktar, the Antwerp 25-year-old, was making sandwiches at Subway when he started clipping influencer interviews on the side. One night he saw $12 on his phone. Two weeks later it was $2,500. He quit. You'd quit.

Anyone with a pulse would quit.

Then the bounties got serious.

AI startup Cluely pays $25 per 1,000 views and hired more than 700 clippers, racking up tens of millions of views. Major League Baseball pays $1 per 1,000. Polymarket dangled 50 cents. New marketplaces like Content Rewards and Vyro post the gigs. It's Upwork for virality.

A 19-year-old in Chicago told NPR he makes $4,000 a month uploading the same clip to four platforms.

But here's where it gets ugly, and not in the way you'd think.

The original creators — the people whose podcasts and livestreams get chopped up — see almost none of this money. Hasan Piker's livestream averages 33,000 viewers. His clips average more than 700,000. Same guy, twenty times the audience, almost none of it watching the actual show. Ed Elson of Prof G Markets put it plainly: clips aren't the promo. Clips are the product.

And the middle people running the networks are the ones cashing in.

Sitting above the whole pile: the platforms.

They reward the spammed clip with algorithmic juice. They take the engagement, sell it to advertisers, and call themselves the victim when the duplicates get too obvious. They built the slot machine. They host the casino.

And then they act surprised when 40,000 teenagers show up to pull the lever.

Pro: A teenager in his bedroom now has the same distribution as a TV network. Anyone calling that exploitation hasn't worked a real job.

Con: The creator on the source video gets a slot in the algorithm. The clipper gets the wage. The platform gets the entire ad market. Two of those three are doing the work.

Our read: The platforms built the slot machine, host the casino, and want a moral panic about the kids pulling the lever. Look up, not down.

[Analysis] Ed Elson, Prof G Media — "The Clip Economy"

Elson's thesis: success is no longer measured by episode watches, but by clip consumption.

Why it matters: Every long-form creator is now their own opening act, playing to an empty room while the clipper out back fills the stadium.

AI companies spent over $1 billion on creator ads in 2025 — up 126% in a year. None of that money is going to the teenagers.

CNBC — Google and Microsoft pay creators $500K to promote AI — The same hidden-money mechanism as clippers, just paying the visible faces too.

Futurism / NYT — 40% of kids' YouTube videos are AI slop — Not just commissioned. Increasingly synthetic. And the children's feeds got hit first.

Fortune — Khaby Lame's $975M AI-twin deal — TikTok's biggest creator licensed his face, voice, and behaviour to a Hong Kong firm. The stock has since collapsed 90%. The "human as product" market just got its first reality check.

The 16-year-old uploading the same clip to four platforms at 2am is:

You can read all our back issue newsletters for free here.

For the love of coffee, see you tomorrow!

Enjoy your Wednesday, keep it caffeinated.

Wednesday, keep brewing.
— C&C.

Read yesterday’s newsletter about India’s 1991 playbook rerun here.

Thanks for reading!

Are you subscribing?

Join your crew of caffeinated sceptics today.

Be sure to get your daily Curse and Coffee fix by hitting the button below.

Open Monday to Friday.