The Big Sip

Image: Wikipedia

The take: Prediction markets are becoming news sources. Editors follow the odds because readers already do.

What happened: Platforms like Polymarket that let users bet on future events now handle billions in trading volume. They attract journalists, researchers, and news consumers who want probabilistic forecasts.

Why it matters: When wrong answers cost money, accuracy matters. This addresses a fundamental problem in journalism: being wrong has no penalty, while being loud often pays better than being right.

What to watch: Will regulators treat prediction markets as unlicensed gambling or recognize them as legitimate information platforms? Will traditional media continue prioritizing opinion or shift toward probability-based forecasting?

Reciepts

• [Report] Polymarket trading volume data — Platform processed over $2 billion in bets on 2024 US election outcomes alone
• [Analysis] Academic research on prediction market accuracy — Markets consistently outperform expert forecasters and polls in political predictions
• [Report] Reuters citing Polymarket odds — Major newsrooms now reference prediction market data as credible probability signals

Traditional media built a business on being first. Prediction markets are built on being right. Turns out the second one scales better.

Here’s The Brew

Prediction markets tax bullshit in real time.

Within hours of any major news event, thousands of traders adjust positions based on genuine conviction.

Confident but wrong bets drain your wallet, creating evolutionary pressure toward accuracy that opinion columns never faced.

Journalists benefit from being provocative. Pundits benefit from being memorable. Traders benefit from being correct.

Newsrooms now cite Polymarket odds as authoritative signals, reversing decades of media hierarchy.

The truth is now profitable.

Two Sides, One Mug

Pro: Prediction markets pool diverse viewpoints into live probability estimates. They consistently beat expert forecasts.

Con: Gambling platforms can warp public discourse and exclude people who can't afford to bet.

Our read: Journalism rewarded hot takes over accuracy, so markets filled the gap by making wrongness expensive. If legacy media wants authority back, it should adopt the same incentives.

Receipt of the Day

Why it shifts the read: Academic research shows prediction markets consistently beat expert forecasts, polls, and media analysis. The statistical evidence is clear: skin in the game produces better information.

Spit Take

"Polymarket: $2B traded. Better forecasts than polls." — 2024 election cycle data

Join your team of caffeinated skeptics.
One take, one counter, one receipt.
Six minutes.

Mugshot Poll 📊

Save Money, Buy Coffee

As an expat living in Vietnam for over 13 years, I often miss my favorite TV programs from back home.

Whether it’s the latest Match of the Day on iPlayer or a comedy series on the UK’s Netflix, I have to use a VPN to access my British TV hit.

After being a customer for over 3 years, SurfShark is the only VPN I trust. It’s reliable, safe, and works anywhere.

Get 3 months FREE with my link: https://surfshark.club/friend/WMz5QGv9

Before we wrap up today…

Does crypto/Web3 intrigue you?

Is worrying about losing money or getting scammed stopping you from investing?

This course is for you!

Click to share (2 referrals get you free access to your very own crypto mastery email course).

Everything you need to unlock crypto in 5 days (for beginners)./

You can read yesterday’s newsletter on the US government shutdown here.

For the love of coffee, see you tomorrow!

Source: Polymarket

Send It: If you enjoyed today’s episode of Curse and Coffee, share it with your fellow skeptics. Here’s the link.

Be sure to get your daily curse and coffee fix by hitting that subscribe button.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading