The World Cup is on, the football is glorious, and FIFA found a way to sell the same seat twice.
Coffee at the ready…
Today we follow the seats, not the ball.
The Big Sip
The World Cup 2026 ticket scandal isn't the price. It's the seats FIFA already sold.
1000’s of fans paid top dollar for the best seats. They ended up in worse ones. New York and New Jersey have subpoenaed FIFA, and the bit they care about isn't the gouging.
How a self-described not-for-profit pulled it off is today's brew.
And the prices?
They went where no World Cup has gone before.
Here’s Your Brew
Each stadium began with four seat categories, Category 1 being the best, down to Category 4.
Fans bought. Then, after the money cleared, FIFA carved a new “Front Category” out of the best seats. It put those seats back on sale at a higher price. Buyers who had already paid for Category 1 were moved further from the pitch, some behind the goals.
They didn’t get the category they paid for.
The host bid promised a $1,550 top final ticket.
By April, the cheapest standard final seat hit $5,785; the dearest, $10,990. No World Cup had charged anything close. Resale listings touched $2 million.
FIFA lifted prices on more than 90 of the 104 matches.
FIFA calls it “variable pricing,” not “dynamic pricing.”
The label dodges a UK rule forcing sellers to show price ranges before the queue. Nobel economist Jean Tirole spelt out the rest years ago. A lone seller who owns the whole platform stops chasing a fair price. It extracts the maximum instead. No rival sells these tickets.
Infantino's defence: cheaper seats would only have fed the touts.
Two days before kick-off, 180,000 tickets sat unsold.
FIFA quietly cut prices across all 104 matches and handed back 70% of its block-booked hotel rooms. A late $60 “supporter” tier appeared, a few hundred seats in stadiums holding 80,000.
Greed meets its own demand curve.
Two Sides, One Mug
Pro: FIFA's case is that the global demand was real. Floating prices keep the upside with the game, not the touts and the black market.
Con: Selling a seat, then quietly handing it to a higher bidder, is bait-and-switch dressed as pricing.
Our read: High prices are legal. Selling Category 1 and delivering Category 2 is the part with no defence.
Receipt of the Day
[Report] New York Attorney General — “Attorney General James and Attorney General Davenport Subpoena FIFA Over World Cup Ticketing”
The receipt: fans who bought Category 1 were reassigned to worse seats after FIFA added new premium zones. Some landed far from the pitch, some behind the goals.
Why it matters: Price gouging is hard to outlaw; selling a seat you don't deliver is not.
Spit Take
Promised top final ticket: $1,550. It reached $10,990.
Extra Curricular Coffee Break Links
[Report] CNN — NY and NJ subpoena FIFA — The seat-zone switch fans say cost them the seats they paid for.
[Analysis] ESPN — World Cup sticker shock — How FIFA's resale marketplace skims a fee on every flip.
[Analysis] The Conversation — A spectacular own goal — Why a monopoly's surge pricing backfired into 180,000 empty seats.
Mugshot Poll 📊
You paid for Category 1 and got Category 2.
Call it:
Bait-and-switch, plain and simple
Dynamic pricing, them's the breaks
Illegal — see you in court, FIFA
I'll watch in the pub, ta
You can read all our back issue newsletters for free here.
For the love of coffee, see you tomorrow!
Enjoy your Wednesday, keep it caffeinated.
Your Wednesday brew, done.
Read yesterday’s newsletter about SpaceX mega-dip here.
Thanks for reading!
Are you subscribing?
Join your crew of caffeinated sceptics today.
Be sure to get your daily Curse and Coffee fix by hitting the button below.
Open Monday to Friday.